BasilZero said:
Barozi said:
Soleron said:
I have no experience of shooter games. I watched 10mins of that livestream.
The game looked much better than 1/5. I don't really understand. The game looked great for a handheld game, you could switch between weapons and kill bad guys, and the levels looked interesting enough. It certainly looked like it was done by a professional studio with millions of dollars. That says more of a 3/5 to me? |
when I watched it they were doing one of the singleplayer missions.
I heard the AI shooting him long before he was walking around the corner. Apparently the singleplayer is 1 hour long, has no connecting storyline (so basically it's like the Spec Ops missions in MW2 and MW3 but even shorter) and it's incredibly hard to get into any multiplayer match.
How is that going to make the game above average (if we take the 2.5/5 = average standard) ?
|
That cant be right....how long are the console versions usually (asking cause I never played CoD lol)?
|
The shortest COD (for me and I played them all) was definitely Modern Warfare 2. Took me either 4 hours or 4:30 hours to complete on normal difficulty (the Veteran playthrough afterwards took a little bit longer). But still it had the Spec Ops mode which can be either played cooperatively or alone, adding another 2 hours to the time.
The campaign of a usual COD game is usually about 5 to 5:30 hours long.
