Barozi on 14 November 2012
| Soleron said: I have no experience of shooter games. I watched 10mins of that livestream. The game looked much better than 1/5. I don't really understand. The game looked great for a handheld game, you could switch between weapons and kill bad guys, and the levels looked interesting enough. It certainly looked like it was done by a professional studio with millions of dollars. That says more of a 3/5 to me? |
when I watched it they were doing one of the singleplayer missions.
I heard the AI shooting him long before he was walking around the corner. Apparently the singleplayer is 1 hour long, has no connecting storyline (so basically it's like the Spec Ops missions in MW2 and MW3 but even shorter) and it's incredibly hard to get into any multiplayer match.
How is that going to make the game above average (if we take the 2.5/5 = average standard) ?
