JoeTheBro on 02 November 2012
And this is why I don't care for review scores. We understand both games are really good (except Zelda imo), but we don't need to argue that because of a .01% higher average Galaxy is better than Ocarina. Do you guys realize that the sample size of only 22 for Zelda and 77 for Mario is nowhere close to being large enough for the score to be accurate to even a third digit. The randomness of reviews means any of the top 5 games could have got this "honor" of being number one.
