| Nsanity said: This is coming from the person who keeps giving Call Of Duty high scores.. "These low points are openly exacerbated by the series’ staunch refusal to get with the times when it comes to game mechanics and level design, ignoring obvious enhancements like big-ticket sequences and proper iron-sights mechanics in favor of their age-old addiction to slow, methodical combat in unnecessarily large environments. And while I get that 343i was deathly afraid to come in and mess with the elements most consider Halo canon, it’s a lot to ask of us who play other games in the genre to continue to stomach a core most left behind half a decade ago. Mind you, some folks might find the videogame equivalent of being forced to eat your vegetables a comforting alternative to Microsoft putting a dash of modern in their combat, but when stacked up to Dishonored, Far Cry 3, and Black Ops II, Halo 4’s campaign feels as empty and uninspired as its strong, silent protagonist." |
What a COD tool bag. I can't take any reviewer seriously when they use lack of iron sights as a low point. It seems that everything that makes Halo unique and great is what this guy doesn't like. This guy (and others) just wants Halo to be like every run of the mill shooter and it bugs the fuck out of me.
That's my small rant. It has nothing to do with the score, but why he gave it the score that annoys me.
