happydolphin on 01 November 2012
| F0X said: Both look nice, but the 360 version has the technical edge. I liked the Wii version's aestetics more, but that is definitely down to taste. Either way the Wii version looks better than most games on the system, including those COD ports which, I believe, run at 30 FPS (and not consistently).
It hurts my brain. |
Herein lies the million dollar question. If the aesthetics have a higher value than visual fidelity, in cases where gameplay isn't as dependent on high definition, could the Wii offer a platform where games are more dense in creative appeal at a better price?
And even if a game had a higher intrinsic value (quality), does that guarantee a higher selling power? What is good and what people buy, do these match?
