| zero129 said: Good point. what about what i said here "like i said how long a user has been here or if they have been banned before doesnt matter in this case imo. Flaimbaiting = Bannable imo. i dont care if its a new member, old member whatever. I see no reason why one user was banned when the other wasnt, and dont give me a weak excuse about how one user should know better etc. Both should know better. Clearly if that other user could sign up he has maybe been a member of another site. lots of sites has lots of the same rules about flaiming etc. or he could of been a toll account (we have lots of them here). So dont give me the "He was new etc etc" thing. This was handled bad simple as. Right thing to do would of been give both users a warning." Now barozi me and you are buds |
so tell me your feelings on the subject i just brought up.We have a policy that allows older members to regain the mod status of a new user (not directly on paper, as in a whiped out mod history, but we see it nonetheless). With that the user starts from the beginning and receives a warning after his next offense.
In order to gain such a status your history needs to be clean for at least half a year. Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 was close to achieving that, but he only kept it clean for 4 months.
These 4 months however have been taken into consideration in my judgement and he was punished with a ban length which is only half of the length of his previous sentence.
In the end this is similar to real life. If you haven't done anything you need to pay some money or do public work. If you're a repeat offender that is on probation and breaks the law once more you're going to jail. If you haven't done something in several years you might be charged with a fine again instead of going to jail.
