By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
crissindahouse on 22 October 2012
Edit Thread
007BondAgent said:
crissindahouse said:
007BondAgent said:
 


I think i might have struk a nerve

or maybe you are just wrong and i wanted to explain it to you but failed hard because you use one illogical argument after the next instead of accepting it that it is much more likey that cod is undertracked as that halo is overtracked.

Because your right and i'm wrong then?

Logic doesn't = fact my friend, and the only way we will officially know if these games were under or overtracked is to wait for the official numbers

that is right, we will only know with official numbers but YOU started to use unofficial numbers.

so just to put that in one post what you said:

1. halo 4 is overtracked

2. it is overtracked because cod is selling better. who cares that cod pre-orders are higher, have one more weeek to go and are  behind pre-orders for the last cod games which could mean cod is undertracked or could maybe sell less as the predecessor (which i don't believe at least for first week)

3. you said reach is also overtracked but looking at npd numbers and official microsoft numbers the first week tracking should be absolutely fine on vgc, overall numbers aren't necessary for the pre-orders.

4. you think halo 4 could sell 2.4 million first week but that this is optimistic. reach sold 2.3 million first week and halo 4 is atm 200k behind reach in preorders on vgc which could very well mean it would sell "only" let's say 1.9 million first week or even less (who knows where pre-order will be in two weeks, maybe 300k or more behind reach). so if 2.4 million is optimistic from you, don't you think you would at least believe 1.9 million as sales?

5.  if that i what you said, why exactly do you still think your theory is more plausible as mine which is that cod could be undertracked and that this is the reason why cod is only so much in front of halo in pre-orders?