By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
lilbroex said:
crissindahouse said:
lilbroex said:
 


This is exactly what I'm talking about.

we know what you are talking about but it is probably not what the mass effect guy meant. just because there is an ea label on the game doesn't mean there has to be something bad in the words of that guy!

Well no duh, once again.


Of course that isn't what he meant. What dev in righ tmine is going to say they will lazy. I never meant that was what he was saying.

I'm saying that you can accurately intperpret his words as that in the end result. They have already shown it by not enhancing the port of ME3.

yo can "duh " as much as you want to people here that doesn't make it more right what you always read out of statements from companies you dislike.

and what he did with the game doesn't change what he said  about the architecture and how this is awesome because it is very developer friendly and will reduce time and money costs for many developers in the future (compared to a potential wii u with bad architecture) and with that the architecture gives them a bigger part of the time/money they have to really invest in the games development and will reduce the part they have understanding how to develop the game for the console.