Izo said:
I would argue getting people off welfare does indeed improve the state of things. Just because a candidate is in the office when things are starting to get better does not mean he is not responsible for it. |
If you take people off of food stamps who need it at least temporarily, you are hindering their ability to help the economy grow. There's no sure way to only eliminate people who are abusing the system. Not only that, but the welfare system accounts for a very small portion of the debt. It's a much better idea to focus on finding ways to create jobs than to cut people on welfare.








