By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
lilbroex on 10 October 2012
Edit Thread
Turkish said:
lilbroex said:
spurgeonryan said:
All of this is still wait and see stuff.

GC and N64 were technically stronger, but for some reason the PS games always looked better and had more to offer. I think the carts could not hold as much on them.


"Looks better" is a matter of opinion. Design, translates into "looks better", not hardware strength.

Most PSX games relied heavily on CG and stills. What looked better were the CGI sprites and backgrounds. The pure 3D PSX games couldn't hold a candle to N64 games.

PS1 came out in 1994, N64 came out in 1996, it would be sad if N64 didn't have better graphics.

False. The Ultra 64 was running games in 1994(Killer Instinct and Cruisin USA.) as arcade hardware. The Nintendo Ultra 64 console was made playable to the public in 95, but it was the same main tech that was in the arcade machines only with a few downgrads in the area of storage and memory.

Its the same with the Sega System 16 and Megadrive/Genesis, as well as NAOMI and the Dreamcast.

The N64 was 1994 technology.