spurgeonryan said:
lilbroex said:
spurgeonryan said: All of this is still wait and see stuff. GC and N64 were technically stronger, but for some reason the PS games always looked better and had more to offer. I think the carts could not hold as much on them.
|
"Looks better" is a matter of opinion. Design, translates into look better, not hardware strength.
|
Well, other than Nintendo no one else thought it was that important to show off the N64 other than Rare, which at the time was basically part of Nintendo in my book. Nintendo never knew how to use the power when they had the advantage. Developers jumped ship and we were left with a great but lacking Wii. Now we are supposed to believe that Nintendo knows what they are doing, that they have learned from their mistakes? Even with the N64 and GC Nintendo never said that graphics mattered. Now all of a sudden they do? I believe he is probably right this time, but I am just saying that it is interesting that everything has changed with Nintendo in such a small amount of time. I guess losing money will finally make you see things clearly.
|
No, they still aren't. You are misintepreting the meaning of the words.
They just finished being berated for graphics for 6 years. He is stating that this console will not be graphically weak. Its more about reasurrance than anything else.