RolStoppable said:
I can see how it can be interpreted that way. What I meant was that they can't afford turnovers, because it's always breaking their back. Unlike other teams which can still come back after one or more miscues. Out of interest, which teams do you think are worse than the Browns? |
Tough to say. I'd lump them in at the bottom with the Raiders, Titans, Chiefs, Jags, and Panthers. Hard to say what precise order those teams belong in, but I'd say the Browns are probably better than the Titans and Raiders, and equal to the other three. The difference between these teams is all pretty small, though.
Where would you put them?
