By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
lilbroex on 10 October 2012
Edit Thread
Mmmfishtacos said:
lilbroex said:
Mmmfishtacos said:
Paul said:
Mmmfishtacos said:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2012/06/10/batman-arkham-city-looks-worse-on-wii-u-than-ps3/
http://wiiudaily.com/2012/08/assassins-creed-3-wii-u-missing-features/

A few examples I've managed to find. I guess well know for sure when Lens of truth get's of hold of them.
Check out the Forbes article for sure, cause the Wiiu version looks pretty bad.

The Forbes one is a great example. Try reading the update. Troll journalism at its finest.


I was looking at the photo of batman and the wii U make him look like a plastic toy.

From the digital foundry link

"There are so many changes in this particular engine-driven cut-scene that we do wonder quite why the developers had to make them. There are both improvements and cutbacks compared to the existing versions."

Those were negative intepretations by the writer. From the day it was announce every change was automatically interpretted as a flaw or downgrade by journalists when all in depth reviews showed that they were in fact upgrades cuppled with simple redesigns.

There were some who not only claimed the armored suit was a downgrade but that the Wii U couldn't run the game with the old suit...when its still the default suit for the Wii U version. On top of that, all of that was BETA footage. They took every crappy screenshot they could and used it to it to make every negative accessment imaginable while completely ignoring all overt improvements.

 

 

 

They ignored all picture like that and instead chose to focus on bad screen captures like these

http://s.pro-gmedia.com/videogamer/media/images/wiiu/batman_arkham_city_armored_edition/screens/batman_arkham_city_armored_edition_4_605x.jpg

http://gamingshogun.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Batman-AC-Armored-Edition-ScreenShots_C1_300_2-460x360.jpg

They always use those two horrid screen caputres taken far out of context to make negative comments off of. You never sees these pop up with them.

http://media.nintendo.com/nintendo/bin/zVzBVM0z3nNKrec94Jwc7ZRVYc9GcCg3/Mn16oZ2NLbyysPdizI7QpHKYHiOdl4ou.jpg

http://s.pro-gmedia.com/videogamer/media/images/wiiu/batman_arkham_city_armored_edition/screens/batman_arkham_city_armored_edition_5_605x.jpg


Those screen do look pretty good, Do we have comparison shots yet?


The only comparison that was done were the initial bullshot comarison right after E3, and even then, after pro analyzed it, they found the Wii U version to be most improved as it actually had objects and effects added that simply did not exist in the PS3/360/PC version on top of higher quality lighting and exploasions.

From what I can tell, no one wants to compare the PS3/360 to the actually real dev released screenshots or video's. Most people only want news that works against the Wii U, not for.