thranx said:
pezus said:
thranx said:
ther is a simple solution. Allow us t disable avatars like we do sigs. It does suck to have all the sexy women avatars because what will come next is the sexy men in response and than this site will be taking a steb back t where its something you come to at home in private vs at work or in public. Its a games site, not a porn site. should be treated as such. |
Do you browse FB only in private? Don't women (and some men) browse celeb rumor websites all the time in public? Who would care if they saw you browsing a website where a woman is not fully-clothed? Is there no freedom in America? Can't a man enjoy good looking women clothed as they want in peace or are they forbidden pleasures like in the Middle East?
|
to be honest I dont care too much. But like i dsaid next will be the sexy men avatars, and than everytime i load a page it will be a series of sexualized avatars instead of gaming stuff. why would i want to enjoy not-fully clothed women on a gaming site? that is what internet porn is for. It justs brings the class of this website down, and sends the message that this is a teenage boy club not a gaming site. They could easily allow me to disable avatars like i do sigs. I wont complain. this site is about video games, and their sales. besides you are free to post all of these pics in the NSFW section or in threads with approiate titles. it just sucks to see them in all the game related stuff. I would even rgue i should change my avatar, and i would if asked. its not a big deal.
|
Sexy =/= sexualised.
Sexualised avatars are not allowed. There has been no rule change in the last 24 hours. All that has happened is that I've clarified what the rule has always been. If there is an overwhelming consensus that pezus' avatar is overly sexual, we'll ask him to remove that, but that has nothing to do with the rule as it stands.
(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective 
