Does Nintendo get too extremely judged for sticking to a formula with their franchises?

[KungKras]

JazzB1987 said:

KungKras said:
I'd prefer if Nintendo stuck to formulas more.

Then Zelda would still be good.

It still is good but they just made alot of mistakes.

 Making it 3 "levels" instead of a world sucked.

They should make more different areas again 3 is not enough. And more exploration is NEEDED! because the 3  "levels" felt like work from the moment you landed there to the boss battle inside the dungeon.  The only place to relax was Skyloft and 1 town is not enough....

I did not finish the game yet (I am almost done) but this was the first time I really cared about whats happening  because  Zelda was your friend not just a random rich chick. So storywise it was awesome  IMHO. I also have no problem at all with the length of cutscenes or "tutorial". (just two days ago I watched all the cutscenes up to the point where I am in the game. It was like watching a movie)

Summary:

I want (a):
-Bigger world.
-More stuff to find/do/explore (more secrets etc.)
-More towns.
-Finally a smart reason for all the rupees (I dont want to repair my stuff THATS WORK! I play Zelda games because I want be an adventurer etcl) I dunno let   me buy a house and alot of stuff to decorate it etc. Better than  buying new shields because they break or giving me a shitty red armor like Twilight Pricness that consumes money  WTF.... 

My core issue with Zelda is the items.

In OoT you had cool weapons, like Din's Fire and the Ice Aroow. In subsequent games, they just became tools to solve specific puzzles.