By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
crissindahouse on 04 October 2012
Edit Thread
Jay520 said:
crissindahouse said:
Jay520 said:
kain_kusanagi said:

Or it could be like this:

Store A sells the same quality of sandwiches as Store B. But Store B adds a few extra "Fresh Pita Sandwiches" or "FPS" to their menu because Store B knows that in their area it's the most popular sandwich. As a result fans of "FPS" go out of their way to shop at Store B because they know they'll get what they want. Unfortunetly Store A doesn't stock enough "Fresh Pita Sandwiches" so less customers shop at their store.

See how easy it is to make crap up and act like it's real.

The fact that you have to resort to insults proves that you have no argument.

said the guy with such an op.

said the guy with such a green avatar.

wait...what game is this?

here:

crissindahouse said:
Jay520 said:

crissindahouse said:

 number 1 isn't invalid. 360 owners onw their console much longer as ps3 owners on average and with that they had more time to play through plenty of games. if you think it makes no sense you also say someone who bought a ps3 last week has to have as many games as someone who bought a 360 in 2005.

2.  why do you want facts when you have no own facts except a ratio and make a full thread out of it? i mean, that's funny, you have no facts but people have to disprove them with facts, otherwise you just say "no facts"


1. The 360 only sold ~20m units of software before the PS3 launched. That amount is too minscule to have an effect on tie-ratio in 2012.

2. Can you disprove me or no?

Just saying "you have no facts" doesn't make it true.

My theory stands

i was talking about how long people have their consoles and not how much software was sold until the us-release of the ps3 because the ps3 release doesn't mean that 360s didn't sell better in the first years and if a 360 owner has his console 15% longer as an ps3 owner (that's only a number to make an example)  the chance is high that a 360 owner also had 15% more time to play games and with 15% more game hours the chance is also high that someone has more games then.

and btw, if you think that makes no sense, why don't you check the ratio of sold software of the last years compared to userbase?

and one more question, since we can clearly see the ratio for ps3 is higher in "rest of the world", does this mean those people have the same problems as european 360 owners? so what you really wanted to say is that in reality, ps3 and 360 owners have no games to satisfy them right? ps3 owners in rest of the world, 360 owners in europe and the biggest problems have console owners in usa because the ratio there is above all other markets for both consoles which mean us-american ps3/360 owners have to have a really really bad gaming life compared to all console owners in the rest of the world!

too bad you are one of them! btw that means for me as european with a 2.5 games lower ratio for 360 as your ps3 ratio in usa, i have much lower emptiness as you have hell yeah! (too bad i also have a ps3 so i only have two console because i feel very empty!)

and i think only a console/game ratio of 1 would be really a good library of games!

btw good night!