lilbroex said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
lilbroex said:
Sal.Paradise said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Yeah...I can see the metamorphosis, but still its a dual shock layout with the buttons. The dual shock came out a generation before any of those Wii controllers. The 360 controller part is undeniable though, same boomerang body, triggers and all. They just changed the placement of the analogs and kept the start, reset and home buttons.
|
Just accept the truth brother!
|
I'm sorry but the posts above you have already debunked that to the fullest. The fact that the 360 comparisons always use the nonstandard controller casing and only from that one angle shows that they are trying their hardest to make it look like something that it isn't.
|
His post is basically saying, "Even if Nintendo copied, eventually somewhere down the line someone copied from them". No ones arguing that point, but they still copied. Its like walking in circles.
|
Its not a copy at all. Its there own design. Check the pictures right above you. Notice taht you never see the comparisons made from any other angle like I said.
The 360 controller has a fat bottom and is standardly white and gray. The Wii U Pro controller is using the Wii Pro Controller with fatter handles that are bent backwards and is solid black just like the previous controller.
|
Dude...come on. Even Sony added more buttons and changed the body of the Move remotes. Nintendo made the body of the controller exactly the same, just with slight differences in where the analog and middle buttons were. They copied the body shell design completely. I hate the 360 controller for fighting games but even I can admit that consensus outside of that is the 360 controller is the most ergonomic controller out.
