makingmusic476 said:
Then why not just buy a ps2? And if it was really about BC, then why did make a deal for a 40gb ps3 before you ever found a 20gb ps3? And if it had nothing to do with Blu-Ray, then why did you declare yourself to be "red and blue" right when you got the ps3? http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=16003&start=0 I'm cool with slight biases, as everybody has them. I'll readily admit that I have a somewhat anti-MS bias, because of Vista and other things. But what I dislike is people who pretend to be neutral when they are obviously not, in an effort to make their opinion seem more important than somebody elses. That is the reason I quoted you in the first place in this thread. |
Ok ... I have a PS2. A fat one with a hard drive in the back. However, there was only one way I'd ever BUY a PS3. I have a ton of 360 games that I've played for review and put them on the shelf. A dude offered a PS3 for 360 games. I traded him 14 360 games for a 40gb PS3. Essentially, it was just a trade. And I had every intention to flip it as soon as I could. And guess what? I am. I found the 20gb PS3 around the block and bought it. Now, I have two of them, and selling the 40gb. The PS3 will sell much faster than me flipping games any day.
And as far as BC, look through my posts. I have ALWAYS - ALWAYS said I'd never buy a PS3 without it. Guess what? I paid like $30 total to have that 40gb PS3 shipped to me. And in the end, I still got what I wanted - a PS3 with full BC.
I am purple now - I have Blu Ray and HD DVD, but still, that's only because I have a PS3. Will I get the free 5 Blu Rays? You bet ... but I am still a huge HD DVD supporter. I can't say I am red because I have a Blu Ray player in the house, right?
How am I bashing a console that I OWN? If it's a turd, it's a turd. I will be truthful and honest - and the PS3 is hyped as the second coming and it's anything but. I have several HD DVDs - I have one Blu Ray and will have a few more. So what - it's my opinion. And I can truthfully say I am not impressed by the PS3 - especially saying it's better than the 360. Sadly, it's not - not right now. Maybe later, developers will churn out better games.
Biased? No. I stepped into the PS3 world unbiased and open. Yeah, I wasn't a fan of Sony - especially after getting burned by past Sony purchases - but I said 'Hay ... a PS3 with BC.' I got it, a few games and downloaded some demos. Yeah, it's cool, but based on what I saw - I also watched a few Blus on it - but still, I am a journalist and review video games. I have the mentality of breaking consoles and games down - and to make a case to buy it or bury it. I took the PS3 through its paces and can say it's a good system - has some cool games and Blu Ray, but it's worth just $300 to the average gamer.
I can say that because - unlike fanbots on this site who own just one system - I have first-hand knowledge.
And since you are good at researching apparently, find the post where I said I didn't have the space for a PS2 AND a PS3. Several other gamers can take that approach, but why should they? Why pay for a feature that was in the PS3 to start off with? Sony's clueless ...