| HoloDust said: Not sure why you listed so many results in first batch - they are all from same user, not sure what that proves, haven't you noticed? At least I had courtesy to provide you with different users ;) Also for your statement GPU score is 5700-5800 at stock - again, I gave you 4 wildly different processors with stock 4850, all giving GPU score in the same area (7300-7500) - so I have no idea where you pulled that off... And once again - embedded in this case means GPU and 1GB of GDDR5 memory are on a single package (not die, I made an error in previous post) - memory bus is still 128bits, with bandwith of 51.2GB/s, exactly the same as 6750m (600/800) - so, oh dear, no there is no benefits when it comes to speed. Now we can go on like this forever, but fact is I really don't care that much - if rumour is true, e6760 is 480:24:8 Turks based GPU with customization, and I would assume customization includes putting (embedding) 32MB of eDRAM on package too. I already made in some other post comparison step by step (shader/TMU/ROP) with Xenos, and at stock speed its "power" is 3x for shaders, 1.8 for TMU, and 1.2 for ROP. If its base clock is higher that stock e6760, 800+ Mhz like someone stated, than that "power" translates to 4x shader, 2.4x TMU, 1.6x ROP....there, you happy? ;) |
What difference does it make how many different users you post? All I showed is that with a higher overclock you get higher scores.
Anyways, no explanation for the odd speeds listes? No? What a surprise.
As for the 5700-5800, look at the scores on the bottom end of the list.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dmv/3151370
See? Slightly overclocked, 6184 total score. GPU score? 5751. Just a few percent above the 5870 of the e6760.
And embedded means the solution embedded directly onto the motherboard as opposed to a graphics card going into an expansion slot. It's not a very difficult concept to grasp I would think.
