By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HoloDust on 24 September 2012
Edit Thread
Baron said:
HoloDust said:
 

5000 score is for GPU score, P score is 5600+ (against 5870 in spec sheet of e6760), so I'd say that's pretty close.
As for 4850 - if you look you can find it by yourself, but here are 2 results at stock speeds:

http://www.3dmark.com/3dmv/3144570

http://www.3dmark.com/3dmv/3574315

That's some 1.3x of stated P score of e6760

Now, I much more prefer using pure GPU scores, as they are not that dependant of CPU - take a look at this result for 4850, but with Phenom II 955 and see that GPU score is pretty much the same as with 620

http://www.3dmark.com/3dmv/3843371

That said, if you want to persist in claiming that e6760 is not based on Turks with 480:24:8 configuration, that's your choice, if not feel free to look for GPU scores of 6570 and 6650m at stock speeds (which vary from 4500-5300) and compare them to 4850 GPU score of around 7500.

So you believe there can be up to 3000 points difference between the same setups without any clock improvements? Come on...

As I said before, 3dmark doesn't always record the correct speeds.

Here's the 4850 with a 50% faster cpu, the QX9650;
http://nl.hardware.info/productinfo/benchmarks/6/3d-chips?products[]=26815&specId=3912&tcId=132

Here's the 4850 with a Core i7 965 which is about 130% faster than the Athlon II X4 620;
http://nl.hardware.info/productinfo/benchmarks/6/3d-chips?tcId=190&specId=4935&products[]=26815

These are independent benchmarks with every component at stock speeds.

Now are you really gonna try and say that a 4850 with a 620 can do the same scores as a 4850 with a Core i7 965?

From what I see the 4850 scores 6100 points at best. Just a few hundred points above the e6760, or a few percent.

In any way, there's no way a 4850 scores well over 6000 points without an overclock or a much faster processor. Let alone 7500+.

 

So no, the 4850 isn't 1.6 or 1.4 or 1.3 times faster. Not even close.

3DMark results (stock clocks):
QX9650 + 4850 http://www.3dmark.com/3dmv/3337424

i7965 + 4850 http://www.3dmark.com/3dmv/3874142

Now, notice difference in P score (not much), notice difference in CPU scores (huge) and notice difference in GPU scores (almost non-existant). Compare GPU scores (7335 and 7441) with GPU results for Athlon II 620 and Phenom 955 (7332 /7395 and 7513). Now, do you get what I'm talking about? You notice how P score when you go from lowest CPU (620) to highest (i7-965) is slighlty raising (7608-8727)? You notice how CPU score is wildly raising (8578-20256)? Now, notice how GPU score is almost identical in all cases? So that's 4850 3DMark GPU Vantage score (not P). Now compare that with 6570/6650M/6750M GPU scores at stock speeds (somewhere around 5200-5300). Divide 7400 (on average) with 5300...around 1.4...Or divide any of stock speed 620/4850 combo results (which are around 7600) with e6760 score from official specs...or just use logic and common sense and compare 4850 specs with e6760 specs....whaterever you do I got bit tired of explaining that card with 800:40:16 config with 10GPixel/s-25GTexel/s-63.55GB/s memory bandiwth with 1000GFLOPs performance is quite a bit more powerfull than card with 480:24:8 config with 4.8GPIxel/s-14.4GTexel/s-51.2GB/s bandwith with 576GFLOPS. So excuse me if I don't continue to elaborate on this matter anymore in the future...