lilbroex said:
Slimebeast said:
Chandler said:
Slimebeast said:
There's no concrete information here, just wishful fantasies.
Batman Armored Edition will not run in 60 fps. It's too hard to get that stability from the Wii U hardware when you're only a third party developer porting a one year old game with a limited budget. |
Source?
To be fair, the thread itself is not really built on stable source, it's just another IdeaMan/NeoGAF post. It could go either way. I see no reason why Arkham City could not run @ 60 FPS. But it's third party. The bottom line is WE DON'T KNOW. So there is no point in guaranteeing one way or asuming like its a done deal the other way.
|
No direct source, but what we do know is:
1). all these reports of Wii U being very roughly on par with the PS360 (although I don't take those rumors and statements literally, but still it hints us that the Wii U is definitely not a power-house)
2). all games displayed so far including the ones who were analyzed by the Eurogamer guy show (among them Batman Armored Edition) that graphics and performance of the launch period Wii U games will be on par with PS360.
|
I've never heard a "real" report that said the Wii U was "just" on par with the current console, only the games. They've all said the Wii U was more capable exept for AC3 which is clear that the developers don't want to be better than the 360/PS3. They are intentionally making it on par.
|
Depends on what you mean by "real". I assume you mean the legitimacy of different reports and statements. Those are hard to value and so far they've all been quite vague, which honestly would make me as an Xbox fan very worried if they were about the Nextbox.
