Assassin’s Creed 3 on Wii U is missing some graphical features, didn’t have enough time to properly port

[zarx]

Deoz said:

zarx said:

A bad capture vs off screen both from a bad quality streaming video is a worthless comparison. 

It's a good comparision specially if you saw the orignal gt video on high res. dont just go and judge libro's video alone.
While i agree kotaku is full of shit, it's missing lighting effects not all of it,  just like the ram thing the extra power of wiiU could enhace the already eeffects it has even when missing some of them ( i doubt they will be many considering a port form this gen consoles). Hence probably the 99% comparision with could include downgrades and upgrades. Something i tought of is that the game actually applies some good MSAA so people just confuse resolution with smooth edges.

Im pretty sure it probably wont have 60fps, but also some one who is saying textures and edges are better on ps3 while having some videos shwoing otherwise doesnt really add to the credibility of such guy.

I am pretty sure that AC3 uses a differed lighting system so that rules out MSAA, as they don't work together. I would guess that the Wii U version is probably lacking the postprocess AA at the moment which would explain the comments about smother edges and more pleasing textures (to some people) on the PS3 version as postprocess AA blurs everything giving it a smooth look, that would also explain why some people thought that the Wii U version looks sharper. Some people don't like the soft look that post AA gives the image where as some people love it. I would assume that if AA is missing from the Wii U version it will be added by launch. But without direct feed capture of the Wii U version it's impossible to tell.

 I have seen true direct feed of the PS3 version and it looks a lot better than the crappy stream, hence the stupididty of comparing the crappy stream.