happydolphin on 20 August 2012
| theRepublic said:
Non threatening to children ≠ Alienating to adults You basically said this in the opening post of the thread. |
I know theR, but the way Charles Martinet did it led it to alienate adults. He could have succeeded in meeting both in the middle, but he didn't.
True, you show that the interview doesn't prove he alienated adults, but it shows at least an effort to appeal to little children above all else, with no concern for what appeals to adults. As such it doesn't prove alieanating adults, but it supports not catering to adults.
Proof I'm trying to be honest here.
