oldschoolfool on 20 August 2012
| spurgeonryan said: You are, but I have seen it in Spirit. They worked their butts off getting Van Damme in this film and then they go and make his screen time really short? We go to see these movies for the older stars. Not to see Crews who is still kind of big and has never really been an action star as far as I can tell. Couture and the other fighters are not action stars and I could care less about. Statham is in every action movie there is. So does anyone really want to see more of him? Norris looked good in this movie. He has aged well is what I am saying. Why not put him in more. Arnold has not aged well, and we see willis in a big movie three times a year so I could live without him as well. Lungren, even though I am not too fond of him, could have been on longer from what I hear. Stallone should have been in the whole movie quite a bit. Van damme is great as a bad guy. Has played a bad guy a lot during his career. My biggest complaint is that Van damme did not get the screen time he deserves. out of all the Straight to DVD action stars his movies are of the highest quality out of Seagal and Snipes, and whoever else. He showed the world that just because he is out of the big cinema action movies he will still work as hard as he can to entertain you. Fuck you Stallone for doing this to Van Damme! They know that people want him, but then give him small parts. Like Dung foo Panda 2. They sure did throw Van Damme's name out there in all of the trailers, but when the film came he only had maybe 3 lines. |
that was only his third time playing a bad guy,as I've seen just about all of his movies,even the terrible black eagle.
