| Kantor said: He didn't sexually assault anybody. The crimes with which he is charged are not a part of any sensible definition of sexual assault. But that's not the point. Sweden and Britain would not be this obsessive about prosecuting a low level sexual assault. They would not threaten to storm an embassy. On top of that, Sweden refuses to guarantee that no further extradition will take place. Sweden has not refused an American extradition request for 12 years. |
You're probably right about the rest of it, but what Assange is accused of doing is pretty serious. If he really tried to deceive the woman into thinking he was wearing a condom when he wasn't or intentionally tore it because he was so desperate to shoot it off inside of her even though she'd told him not to, that is a rather sensible definition of sexual assault, actually.
