Kasz216 said:
It seems like your not familiar with the particular legislation hsitory of that law. It was ruled unconsitutional then the white house declared "We believe it's unconstituional, and therefore we don't plan to appeal." The law is tied up in the courts only becaue other groups won the right to appeal when the federal government declines to appeal. This is in comparison to DADT, which WAS appealed repeatidly. When asked why he appealed Obama said "I do have an obligation to make sure that I’m following some of the rules. I can’t simply ignore laws that are out there, I’ve got to work to make sure that they are changed."
He went from the span of a month or two of saying "I have to appeal every unconstituional law because it''s the law" to "I'm not going to defend it because it's unconsitutional." |
Hmm, a little while ago you didn’t even know which Proposition it was.
You can not be talking about Prop 8 because –in the first place the White house would not appeal *declaring unconstutional* thus null and void a law they do not agree with- Prop 8 *takes away rights* that Obama (And Barry Goldwater, Ford, Carter, Clinton, Barbara Bush etc.) wants’ people to have - that is every adult has the right to legally marry the person they love.
And the second, Obama has no jurisdiction over California law. He is not a resident, nor seeking to have a same-sex marriage nor was he a sponsor of Prop 8. Those are the only people who can. Obama has NO legal standing on Prop 8 – he can’t do anything about it.
Where are you getting this misinformation?







