By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
selnor on 17 August 2012
Edit Thread
happydolphin said:
DirtyP2002 said:
lilbroex, do you actually try to look like a fool or does this happen by accident?

1st Devs tell you you all you want to hear so that you buy their game. A dev saying the next release will be better than the prior ones is not surprising. We jus have to see it first. I am not saying the games look worse, we just have to see it.

2nd The GCN was not as powerful as the Xbox. This isn't even up for debate. The best looking games last gen were Doom 3, Halo CE, Halo 2, Half Life 2, Splinter Cell or Panzer Dragoon Orta. Most of them were (console) exclusive for the Xbox. Even games like Enclave were above most GCN games. The spec sheet obviously proves you wrong without a doubt.

I found it is up for debate, and he argued it pretty well. And this is from a person who doesn't always agree with him.

I think in this case you look more like the fool because you just state your opinion whereas he actually goes into details about why the games outperformed those you listed.

Joke's on you.


LOL.

No he dooesnt go into details.

Firstly he disregards more than 50 websites facts about Xbox and GC figures.

2ndly he disregards every websites and articles opinions that Xbox is clearly more powerful.

3rdly he stated Xbox polygon count had no game above 12,000. When Dead Or Alive 3 contains 10,000 per character not including scenery at all. Thats 20k onscreen without scenery. 

4thly he states the game known as Rebel X which was rumoured to be Rogue Squadron 1-3 in late 2013 to release for late 2014 was canned because Xbox couldnt handle it. Funny how IGN were frothing at the bit to see what improvemebts the Xbox version would have. Notice how IGN knew the Xbox was more powerful.

http://uk.xbox.ign.com/articles/454/454215p1.html