By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
selnor on 16 August 2012
Edit Thread
lilbroex said:
wfz said:

Whether or not it's true, this isn't good news. The fact that this is even a debate shows that:

1) The Wii U is really not that much more powerful than current gen consoles
2) Developers feel like bashing Nintendo
3) These developers don't actually understand what the hardware can do


No it does't show any of those things. There were people who thought the PS1 had better graphics than the N64. There were people who debated whether the Wii had better graphics than the PS2...some still think the PS2 has better graphics for that matter.

Most make these arguments because it puts them in higher standing with Sony and Micrsoft was well as there fanbase. They are saying what they want to here.

Of course this may be another scenario with words being taken out of context like they were with the Tekken devs comment. It doesn't sound like he is stating what the console can do at max. He's saying what he has observed it to do at the least as far as I can tell.

Fact of the matter is that every known Wii U third party game is outputing at higher resolutions and frame rates than the PS3 or 360 on top of rendering to a second screen. That says enough.

Who the hell thought PS1 had better visuals than N64?

Every PS1 3d game had polygons jumping and shifting about. Mario 64 was a launch title and PS1 didnt have 1 single 3d game that matced it.