Cobretti2 said:
lilbroex said:
wfz said:
lilbroex said:
wfz said:
lilbroex said:
Soundwave said: If they could get 1080p for even games like NSMBU and Nintendo Land it'd be relatively satisfied but that doesn't seem to be the case. |
They can. Nintendo chose not too for their own titles as it would be added cost with no benefit. All first party will be running at 1080p natively however.
|
You just said:
1) Nintendo isn't making their own titles 1080p due to cost.
2) All first party games will run at 1080p natively.
I'm confused.
|
If I reworded it the way you did, I would be confused too.
|
Can you restate your post in a more explanatory way? I'm literally confused here on what this all means. Is Nintendo making all first party games run at 1080p?
|
Your intepretation "due to cost."
My statement "unecessary added cost"
That should clear things up.
|
no matter what spin you put to clarify it the fact is.
"All first party games will run at 1080p natively."
All and will in that sentence only mean one thing. So that sentence already is false since Nintendo's launch games will be in native 720p.
|
1st party was a typo. I meant 3rd party. Otherwise, I wouldn't have said that they would all be 720p, obviously. Also, it was stated in the news articles I posted so it really doesn't make sense to keep begging this after that anyway.
If all of you insist on making that big of a deal about it. Then to clear it up once and for all. 1st party games will be 720p at launch and 1080 after. All 3rd parties that have confirmed resolutions have stated that they will be at 1080p and the word from developers themsleves is that Arkham City and Assasins Creed will be 1080p at 60 fps.
Is that a problem with you?