archbrix said:
I don't believe that Nintendo is saying it poorly, but rather, some interpret what they're saying poorly. Nintendo never said that the things listed in your first paragraph weren't important or did not improve the experience. What Iwata in fact says is that power isn't ALL important and that wonderful graphics won't help IF the gameplay isn't good, and he's absolutely right about that. They basically also reference the point of diminishing returns, which is also very important. You could have a console capable of near Avatar-quality graphics, but if it costs $1000+ and the games take 5 years to develop and have to sell 50m+ copies just to break even, the industry will crumble. I'm not saying that graphics and tech can't feasibly be better than WiiU, even right now, but Nintendo understands how the industry works and is looking to give devs new ways to enhance gameplay ideas... all while remaining in a realistic budget. |
This is indeed it. That is why I am waiting for Microsoft and Sony to destroy themselves by trying to look big. If Microsoft makes a console with the specs that were rumored then Nintendo has the next gen in the bag beause it will cost to much to buy and too much to develop for in comparison.
The Wii u was designed with being able to make good looking games cheaply in mind. I still remember the comment they made a last year I believe. The dev kits for the Wii U are suppos to allow you to make games for the Wii U with the same ease as making a game for the Wii.







