| Jay520 said: Do you expect us to sprawl the internet to measure how much publicity or coverage their games received? And how exactly so you gauge if one game received too much or too little publicity? |
I don't. It should be common sense. Or at least I thought it would be.
I'm looking for the good game that don't appear on near every Wii games list everywhere, ie. big name titles. Those are all that peole seemed to be posting then going on a roundabout crusade of redefining them and there situation so that they get them included.
http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/top_ten_most_underrated_wii_games
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_are_some_good_unknown_wii_games
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100725160310AAL2iF2
http://www.videogamer.com/features/article/top_10_wii_games_made_for_gamers.html
Its always the exact same big name titles(give or take) that people think didn't sell as much as they should have. People don't understand the difference between a big titles and unknown titles. Anyone who doesn't know of those titles hasn't looked at all. They are the first things that will pop up on google.
I'm looking for good games that are hardly knwon even amongst the hardcore Wii base. If this is too difficult a task or if it is too hard to understand then nobody is making you do it.
