DigitalDevilSummoner said:
|
Being a gamble and being ambitious are NOT The same things. There's nothing more to it than that. You know how everyone complained about Dragon Age II being simpler and more boring in spite of it being more action packed? same deal. Making a game simpler but prettier is not ambitious, even if the game series has been known for complexity and depth. Simply changing course and trying something new does not mean it's ambitious. yes they wanted lots of sales...but they ALWAYS want lots of sales, there's nothing special or outstanding about XIII aside from its admittedly good (if generic and uninspired) graphics. It's just a simpler version of something that already exists. To be ambitious is to strive for something new, to do something outstanding, to stand head and shoulders above others in a bid for wealth and popularity.
to be ambitious requires action, not simplicity.
My Console Library:
PS5, Switch, XSX
PS4, PS3, PS2, PS1, WiiU, Wii, GCN, N64 SNES, XBO, 360
3DS, DS, GBA, Vita, PSP, Android