By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
McDonaldsGuy on 19 July 2012
Edit Thread
insomniac17 said:
McDonaldsGuy said:

Deporting all of them will take very little resources, in fact, you will only have to deport very few of them (most will self deport). We have the resources to go to war with multiple countries but can't protect our own? No.

There should be NO allowing them to have a way here legally - we tried that in the 80s and it failed MISERABLY. This Gary Johnson guy clearly has no clue what's going on here.

http://www.ontheissues.org/gary_johnson.htm#Immigration

I live in California and cannot support anyone that supports illegal immigration. Too bad cause Gary looks like he'd be pretty good if it wasn't for that mark.

Bolded: Sure. I don't have any data for or against this point. It seems to me that it would cost a lot, but I don't actually know. If you have any data on it, please share.

Did we try it in the 80s? What exactly did we do then?

I'm not exactly sure what your source is for. It looks to be the same as what I linked to.

Well we already did it in the 1950s, Eisenhower did it. It took very little resources.

Reagan said he would give amnesty to 1 million illegal immigrants living here, and then he would secure the border and the USA Government would never do it again. He clearly lied. It ended up being 3 million and he did not secure the border and now the USA Gov. wants to do it again. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

The only candidate I think is absolutely perfect is Ron Paul. He wants to abolish the Fed, end these costly wars, tackle illegal immigration, end the Patriot Act, etc. etc.