By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
lilbroex on 12 July 2012
Edit Thread
zarx said:
lilbroex said:

There are two words taht show that you don't know what you are talking about again(looks better). This bluff may have worked with a person who doesn't know what they are talking about but not I.

First off, most effect differences can't be demonstrated by stills. It has to be in motion.

Second, that screen shot you posted is on the same level of Battlion Wars 2 on the Wii and Little King Story, not P-100. Possibly even less than those two. They are all the exact same simplistic modal remapped with the same undetailed texture set. The shadows are one shade. You could do that on the Dreamcast (see 100 Swords)

There are many shades of light and shadow in P-100. All of the character are diverse with a large array of interchangeble euqipment for each individual unit with a diverse array of actions and animations over a large scale. The individual modals are not as detailed either. There are nowhere near as many resource intensive effects going on if any in that game with white soldiers and simple bubble barrier. The enviroment itself is not as detailed as in P-100 nor as diverse. The texture quality is not as high either. They look kind of washed out and grainy.

That game is no more detailed than a standard RTS from 5 years ago. That is miles away from what P-100 is displaying.

With that I am done. You keep ignoring every point I show you jumping to something other area and then failing for the exact same reasons as before. You, just like the guy from before, have no idea how to read graphical facts. All you seem concerned about is what looks prettiest to you.

I never said it looks anything special I said it looked as good as P-100 exept for ground textures not sure why you had to also say the textures looked like crap as if that was some great obsovation. Tho I have to say in terms of lighting Clone Wars blows P-100 away.

I have seen P-100 in motion and frankly I see nothing special, and you have yet to actually show anything to back up your claims. Because I see nothing technically impressive from the game, tho it does look great aesthetically. You claim it has better texture effects than the best of the PS3 yet all I see are some colorful textures with no great detail, some specular and maybe a bit of bump mapping all things that devs were doing on the Xbox 1.

"in terms of lighting Clone Wars blows P-100 away." No, no it does not. Not even close. Once again. The lights and shadows in Clone wars are "all" 1 shade. There are multiple shades in P-100. That alone sput its miles ahead of clone wars.

I've shown you plenty and you have ignored every bit of it. I'm not going to show a single other thing. There is still plenty amongst all of the demonstractions you chose to skp over. If you see no details then you are not looking. You can see the polygon detail on the building and the shading on each windows over large distance. The round enemies, lush enivornment. Not  a single washed out texture in sight.

I didn't see much bump mapping used in P-100 at all. Most of it looks more like normal mapping and a little displacement mapping which are more resource intensive and accurate. That is defnitely bump mapping in clone wars because its easy to see how flat and unfeatured it is.