happydolphin said:
Of course disc-based systems were a value-add to games because of higher capacity and price of manufacturing, but they didn't need to be DVDs or Blu-Rays, and if they were either, they didn't need to guarantee movie-playback, which cost money to secure. But if you're going there, might as well make it able to play movies, but that's just a gimmick still (movie playback that is). Motion controls as in the Wiimote will not take a backseat, as they are fully part of the WiiU strategy. You are aware that the WiiU largely supports only one tablet. As such, the WiiU's main multi-player controller is the Wiimote. And plus, even if that were not the case, motion controls would have only taken a back seat in the theorhetical scenario had Nintendo itself abandoned it. So no they don't inherently take a back seat, that end would have to be fabricated artificially. Sony trolled Nintendo so Nintendo had to go with Panasonic. You don't take the rights to games made by Nintendo because that's sleezy and unethical. The rights belonged to Nintendo, and Sony tried to dishonestly steal what was not theirs from Nintendo. Now, and for hopefully as long as they continue to behave anti-Nintendo, Sony will pay the price for their shameful decisions. 3rd parties moved to Sony because Nintendo was being unfair to them, and Nintendo got what they deserved. I'm glad it happened, and I hope it happens to all companies that become bullies like that. I'm glad it also is happening to Sony today. Nintendo brought a measure of quality assurance in the time of the NES/SNES. Thanks to Sony, Nintendo has no way to eradicate shovelware anymore and the industry is nearing collapse. How long will people want FPS and will the industry rest on unsure foundations? Even Nintendo has fallen prey to Sony's schemes of releasing "whatever you want" with 0 concerns for quality and depth. They had to, otherwise they went under. PC gamers were still playing cinematic games and Worms when Nintendo released the N64. As far as I remember, console games were always regarded as graphically superior to PC games, as they were mostly japanese and supported by japanese game makers, who injected great amounts of visual art into their games, and PCs were not progressing as fast as today especially not at today's prices. Back then a regular machine that could play microsoft flight simulator could cost thousands and did not offer anything close to the compelling qualities of Mario 64 and all the Nintendo 64 games. Even the SNES was leaps beyond what we were seeing on PC from a Software point of view. Arcade fanatics were a dying breed so nobody cared about them. All the games that arcades could only have were coming to the consoles, so the edge was no longer there and there was little point going to the arcades except for the arcades that had HW value-adds, those that you call gimmicks. |
I never knew a format for playing movies and expanding media space was a gimmick. I'll let you believe that. If you believe that theres nothing to argue, at that point its a lost cause.







