Nintendo can never seem to satisfy fans

[S.T.A.G.E.]

happydolphin said:

S.T.A.G.E. said:

Cobretti2 said:
you guys do realise this is a forum?

if you want to debate 10 pages of what a gimmick is go somewhere else.

I come here to read relevant posts.


on a side note to STAGE:
motion controls are a natrual progression too.

They are a natural progression if they push gaming forward in an intuitive manner and can control the complex as well as simple tasks. The role of the wii-mote was to give non-gamers a chance to join in on the fun they never seemed to get a chance to be apart of. They had their fun, lets see if they take the next step.

True, but I would say Nintendo had the traditional games in mind also, if Red Steel (Nintendo asked it from Ubisoft that much should be apparent) and Metroid Prime 3 (Retro's first Wii game) are any indicator. Also, TP for Wii made extensive use of the Wiimote, and was definitely aimed at older gamers (much darker theme and more epic proportion in general).

Whether Ubisoft asked Nintendo or not they are seemingly the best publishers to take the task of any gimmick Nintendo comes with and makes it seem like a fluent and fluid experience. Ubisoft blew me away with their demonstration of Zombie U. That is about the only game I am excited for on the Wii u. Ubisoft even managed to make ghost recon demos look pretty good for Kinect even though they were the least intuitive of all of the multiplat versions. No doubt they are up to the task. Metroid prime on the Wii was pretty fun, but again its and experience like COD on the Wii was for me, but it didnt feel like a natural progression, just a fun way to enjoy quick point and shoot kills until I went to play COD or Battlefield. Battlefield is another game that I doubt would make sense on the Wii U unless Nintendo gets headsets. It requires a serious team or else you're screwed.