Why didn't Nintendo make more realistic, violent games for the Wii just to prove 3rd parties wrong?

[S.T.A.G.E.]

WiiBox3 said:

S.T.A.G.E. said:

WiiBox3 said:

S.T.A.G.E. said:

WiiBox3 said:
Nintendo doesn't often make games like the ones you described, because they don't have that specialization. But they haven't had any issue publishing mature games that were developed by third parties.

Nintendo could make a violent game any day, they just dont want to. It has nothing to do with specialization but rather the fact that thats not the image they are trying to send as a gaming compay.

Not sure it has anything to do with image. Because when the publish an M rated game it's their name that is plastered on the front of the box.

What mature games has Nintendo made for the Wii? 

Not made, published. Though they have not published a M rated game in the US since the Game Cube. Here are some mature games published by Nintendo:

Wii:

Fatal Frame IV (Japan only)

Disaster: Day of Crisis (Europe, Japan, Australia)

Resident Evil: The Umbrella Chronicles (Australia only)

Gamecube:

Geist

Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem

 

NOA doesn't like to Publish M rated games, because Nintendo published M rated games haven't sold enough in the US in the past.

Thats publishing. Anyway, they don't sell in America because exactly that those games aren't what the majority are being made for and again, Nintendos image isn't built that way. I guess you put it correctly Nintendo of America has put out this image of itself where in America is the dress which exlains what you are all about. Really thoughtthat goes anywhere even though it goes double for America.