The U.S. or NATO shouldn't have to intervene. The U.N. should have already sanctioned and if that failed invaded.
What's the point of the existence of the U.N. if it doesn't nothing? Why does the U.S. have to lead every assault on evil? Why does Russia and China veto every U.N. security action?
Those are the questions we should really be asking.
I say the U.S. and Britain/U.K. should leave the U.N. and ask all free nations to do so too. The free nations of the world should form a new coalition that only deals with security actions, maintaining world peace and humanitarian issues. No international nanny laws, no bullshit currency exchange laws, just security and relief.
The U.N. is crippled by nations like Russia and China. I mean why is Russia a permanent member of the security council with veto power? It's a joke. Every time a dictator is killing his people Russian says no to all actions because they have some kind of business with him. I'm sure you all know about the attack choppers and anti air systems that Russia is supplying to Syria. Here we are trying to stop the blood shed and Russia is giving Assad more weapons to kill his people with. If the U.N. had the best interests of humanity in mind it would kick out all human rights offending nations and quickly act when suffering happens.
Syria should be invaded and it's leaders removed from power. Anything less would be a failure of the free nations of the world. It may be a more complicated war than Libya, but if the U.N. and all supporting nations sent in full support, Assad would have no military option other than surrender.
Oh and don't tell me it's illegal to overthrow governments. It seems like the U.N. protects bad behavior more than it encourage good. Again I will ask what's the point of the U.N. if it does nothing and watches innocent people suffer and die?
