cleveland124 said:
It's very simple, 90% of the gaming public thought PS3 would own the market by now. Developers don't care that the PS3 has been out for 11 months less in Japan or 15 months less in Pal regions. Did this help the Xbox against the PS2, and extend the life of the xbox? Games will sell better currently and the foreseeable future on the 360. Or did you miss the rash of PS3 game cancellations and the big titles that either got ported to the 360/Wii or moved altogether? The Xbox 360 and PS3 lives will end at the same time regardless because neither has become the phenomenom that was the PS2 or PS1 for that matter. PS3 is not selling twice as fast as 360. To compare launch to launch you are looking at a launch where the 360 had extremely limited supply to a launch where PS3 had 1 million units. Current sales are better to compare since neither is supply constrained. Current sales according to the site are 46% better than 360. This sounds good until you realize the Wii outsells the PS3 + Xbox360 in Europe. But you are probably in your dream world and believe that the PS3 doesn't compete with Wii. Sony did an AMAZING job with PS1 and PS2, no complaints there. But that doesn't mean they are foolproof. The PS3 has been a nightmare from the start. We can argue til we are blue in the face about their launch, but if you'd have said PS3 wouldn't sell 10 million in it's first 15 mos on the market, would sell less than half as much as the Wii during that time, and had no chance of passing the 360 worldwide by the end of 2008, people would have laughed at you and called you the dumbest person on earth. Notwithstanding arguing that this was a good thing for the PS3.
|
He meant in PAL regions, where so far, the PS3 has sold about twice as fast (400k is ALMOST twice as much as 215k, as he put it)
And also, the PS3 only had about 400k at launch, not 1 million. The Wii had 2 million at launch, and I don't know how many the 360 had, but it was probably higher than 400k WW.








