kowenicki said:
I think his main point was that Sony just buy up studios and that this is a costly way to go about things... it is... he's right. They see a studio they like and buy them... then sit and watch them produce a game every 3 years (or worse). They have too many studios producing too many games of ok quality that just dont sell. Even Sony themselves acknowledged this recently. |
Exactly. Makings games that don't sell is bad business. I think that's why we saw so few exclusives from Sony at E3 this year. I think they quitely canceled a bunch of games to save costs. Sadly Last Guardina may never see the light of day or at best will get sent over to PS4 like Ico switched from PSX to PS2. Maybe Sony learned their lesson and we will start hearing rumors of canceled games, closed studios, and consolidations. If Sony is smart, by the time the PS4 launches, their business model will look a lot more like MS's. Off the shelf parts, a few high quality devs, and monotisations. I also think it's time for Sony to get out of the handheld market and switch to tablets and smart Phones. The Galaxy S3 is more powerfull than a Vita. If Sony took the Vita, added a Phone to it and sold it int he same way that Samsung sells the Galaxy Note, (as a small tablet with phone built in), it could set the smart phone world on fire. People are tired of playing games on their phones without real controls and Sony could fix that with a Phone enabled Vita. They kind of tried it before, but it wasn't a full console.
And my point about charging for PSN wasn't that I want to pay for PSN. My point was that MS makes a killing charging for XBL so Sony would make money from charging for PSN. As a gamer I'd rather onling gaming be free on all consoles. But Sony is sinking and subsciption based online could help.








