By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
crissindahouse on 05 June 2012
Edit Thread
snowdog said:
lightingpower said:
snowdog said:
Did you actually watch the conference..?

Here's what you need to do. Watch Nintendo's 2006 E3 conference and compare it. End of discussion.


was it really that much better? It showed the same kind of stuff, expect the zelda and metroid, and the zelda was for the gamecube as well

Good god, of course it was better. Mario Galaxy, Zelda, Metroid, SSBB, Wii Sports...the list goes on and on.

All Nintedo needed to do was have one, just one, hardcore first party title showing the fact that the GPU in the U is at least two generations ahead of the Xenos and RSX. They didn't have a single first party title, even Pikmin 3, that was impressive in terms of eye candy. They ALL looked like Wii games.

And the third party support is shite too. Where was Madden, FIFA, Tiger Woods, Far Cry 3, Black Ops 2, Medal of Honor, Battlefield, Crysis 3..? Where were EA, Capcom, Square Enix..?

Third party titles such as Assassin's Creed 3, ZombiU, Aliens Colonial Marines and Arkham City showcased the graphical prowess and the U GamePad better than ANY of the first party titles. This E3 showing was a failure of EPIC proportions.

maybe because many or most nintendo programmers did never have to make a hd game with many polygons and so on^^  i have no clue how it works for all these people working with different tools and so on but i jusz can't imagine how someone who never had to make such a game can be as good as people who work on these games with the needed tools for ten years.