| amp316 said: Between some of those lines I read "We just don't want to makes games for Nintendo because they are poopy heads." |
sometimes i have the feeling they say it because they fear nintendos own games as competition. just look at sony or microsoft. they have plenty of exclusives as well (yes even microsoft has a lot, most games are just not talked about) but only a few of both are real competition for ea or activision or whatever. only maybe halo, fable, uncharted, gran turismo and 2-3 more. but on nintendo consoles you have every freaking game from nintendo as competition because most sell so damn well and if all nintendo owners use their money for nintendo games, they have less for ea or activision games.
and sure, like some said, they wouldn't have to have great ideas for the tablet and could make games only with a map on the tablet or so but if nintendo will develop great ideas for that tablet, would people really buy games of other developers without that, seeing that it is possible to make great things with the tablet? i believe many would think "hmm nintendo games use the tv and the tablet very good, ea and activision games only use the tv screen, i get a better experience with nintendo games" and i can imagine that reviewers would see it as well like this and would give worse ratings for games not using the tablet very good.
