EGM mocks Endless Ocean - instead of reviewing it

[ClaudeLv250]

ckmlb said:
Did I argue that it's not a game? I argued against this attack on EGM for something that is entirely their choice and since there is a 1up review.

Wow, the editors of EGM have free will. We had no idea.

1up doing the review just makes EGM look that much more in the dark ages when they're running from and screaming about the "non-games" while 1up simply reviews the game, gives it a good score, and moves it.

Also I don't know what Everblue 2 is and I've never heard of it.

I didn't think my post was that hard to understand.

It's the spiritual predecessor to Endless Ocean for the PS2. EGM reviews it, moves on. Endless Ocean comes along. "NONGAEM!!11" Insert rant about how all games should adhere to EGM's factually incorrect "rules," completely ignore the fact that they already reviewed its predecessor and didn't have a problem with the concept then.

Also the only one here who is doing anything ban-worthy is you since you just verbally attacked me with references to a 'boot in the mouth' and a beating on the floor.

I didn't say anything about bans, I just said that you weren't a mod anymore so you'll have to watch your back now when conjuring up tales of the Wii Army and how they ruin everything. Those attempts at diverting attention didn't save Hus or Killzone3.

Also it's no secret that many Wii fans here view the game magazines/sites as anti Wii and/or anti Nintendo and it has been mentioned several times, especially with regards to EGM/1up as indicated by people predicting that Mario Galaxy would get bad EGM/1up scores simply because it was a Wii game.

The issue is that EGM wrote a shit piece about EO not being a game despite reviewing previous games not fitting their "criteria" for what is and isn't game. including the game's predecessor. Your issue is that people shouldn't say mean things about EGM because you like them and Nintendo fanboys don't.

I don't really see the correlation.