Malstrom: "My purpose is to reveal and inform people about Nintendo."

[noname2200]

Araknie said:

errorpwns said:
I love how analyst make up thousands of excuses for the losses Sony and Microsoft encounter every year in their Game divisions, yet Nintendo has one bad year (mind you it was during the release of a new handheld, and their old one was dying off) and everyone starts putting their piece in on how Nintendo is a dismal failure of a company.

Plus you have to add: doing new hardware without copying Sony or Microsoft, assuming people and developers for the WiiU, and doing actual games for the WiiU.

The only started 2 new consoles in 2 years, if the lose some money it's a total failure. (sarcasm)

I'm really tired of people talking about Nintendo and never Sony and Microsoft.

PS: Sony having major lossess since the launched the PS3, last year even the other electronic markets have gone wrong, one day of critics and stop. This internet world it's not good anymore.

No need to play the victim card here. Most of the folks in this thread who are critical of Nintendo's business practices find the other two companies' business practices bad too. Worse, actually. But that doesn't mean Nintendo's not made a long series of missteps.

Can you name the last time that Nintendo ran an annual loss? Can you name the last time Nintendo launched two new systems in two years? Can you recall the results of that last attempt?

If your assertion is that professional analysts suck at their jobs, I don't think many here will disagree with you. But that's not the purpose of this thread, so why is it being brought up?