By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Michael-5 on 17 April 2012
Edit Thread
Rath said:
_crazy_man_ said:

IMO its.

II > III > V > I > IV    (Remakes not a factor)

Gen 3 was like 2002-2006

I was in Middle/High School then and my parents were no longer giving me money to buy games.

So with what money I could earn I focused more on my GC games than my GBA games. ;p

I agree, gen II were the best games.

Gen I had the best pokemon though, can't beat the original 151.

Really, that's your order of preference?

For me it's I = II > V > III > IV

Diamond/Pearl were the worst, but I thought Ruby/Saphire also marked a lowpoint in the franchise. Black/White to me marked a rebound in quality, but nothing will match the quality of the first 2 and the uniqueness of those two generations of Pokemon.

Why did they get lazy? and why didn't they introduce new types after Gen II?



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results