| justinian said: How can selling almost 100m consoles and whipping the competition be considered as "lacking in foresight"? |
1. One is a good question because as Viper mentioned, the Wii was priced cheap in Japan (212$), and in the states came bundled with Wii Sports at 250$. But to think that Wii Sports was a refined demo, couldn't they throw it in for free with a more high-end console at 250$ in the states. Japan's pricepoint is more sensitive in the topic I think though. Raising the price up for HD capability would have been tough, because Japan was laregely favoring Sony while coming into gen 7, it wasn't as bad stateside.
2. I really, really think so. Remember, the Wii wasn't just a risk for Nintendo, it was a risk for everyone partnering with them. It was a huge paradigm shift that involved a reformation of business processes within the partner organizations. Way too much to ask from the clear loser in the home console space coming into gen 7. Since they were all getting HD ready for the PS3 entering the gen, had Nintendo been HD ready, they would have been in MS's shoes from a red ocean standpoint, or at least sharing it 50-50 with MS or 3-way with MS and Sony, and would have been still printing money on the blue ocean front. I think that's what they're trying to achieve with the WiiU, but had they believed in themselves they could have done it a gen sooner when the golden opportunity (the PS3's flop launch) was there for the taking!







