Navane said:
The problem is that there is little reason to own a Wii-U unless third-party games are significantly better with a tablet controller. I want to see more than just a new controller to play existing games on. If third-party games are gonna looks exactly the same, then why own a Wii U to begin with? It also kinda peevs me off knowing that if this turns out to be true, then there shouldn't have been any reason why Nintendo can't include a better processor and more RAM. It shouldn't be hard, and would give developers more of a reason to port their games over to Wii-U for "the definite experience". It just doesn't make sense if it's not at least a little bit more powerful. At this point, the only reason to own a Wii U is going to be for Nintendo's own games. |
Yeah I kinda gotta wonder ... even a very cheap AMD GPU like the Radeon 6670 w/1GB GDDR5 RAM ($99 retail) is something Nintendo could probably get for $60-$70 a pop (even that might be overstating its price for a big company like Nintendo). Throw in a reasonable triple core CPU and you'd likely have a kit that blows PS3/360 out of the water and could still cut a small profit at $299.99 retail ... factoring in a $60-$70 manufacturing cost for the controller.
It probably wouldn't fit into a case as small as the one Wii U is using, but really, I don't understand why they're so obsessed with having the smallest case possible right out of the gate. Being able to shrink the case 3 years down the line would provide a nice mid-cycle sales boost anyway as the PS3 and 360 both got with their slim revisions.