thranx said:
KungKras said:
It must take a very closed mind to NOT accept evolution as a proven fact.
|
wow. where is all of this cold hard eveidence than? Fact is evolution is still not a fact. Let alone a proven fact. It is just the only viable theory we have on how life came to be, but it is most certainly not a proven fact. Yes there is evedence for it, but to be a proven fact it takes more than evidence. It has to be undeniable and overwhelming eveidnece or reproducable in a controlled enviroment. which we do not have yet. Its very closed minded to take snippets of information and form a "fact" from it that you can not prove.
EDIT: I do believe in evoltion myself so i am not going to argue against it. But i do realize there are some holes in it, and it isn't reproducable in a lab experiment as far as i know.
|
From what I've seen, the holes in the theory has more to do with missing links and how the very first organism originated.
What I meant was that it is a fact that species evolve over time, genes change properties randomly, etc, and we have seen it happen lots of times, so that species can evolve is as close to a fact as it possibly can be.
