Jereel Hunter said:
Not very different story from the book?? Is that a joke? (Sorry, rant incoming) I hated this movie, mostly because I read the books. If you've never read the books, maybe it's an ok movie, but my feelings are very different. When I was young I found the series among my dad's old books and read them over and over. The names of characters are the same as the book, as well as a few small interactions. Everything else is different. The characters are NOTHING like they were in the books. The Tharks are nothing like they were in the books(other than physical appearance). I don't understand how you can say "Tells you something about American's taste in movies. (dumbed down)." What wasn't dumbed down about this movie? They took every cliché in the book, (the figerative book, not the book the movie was based on) and added it in at the cost of the original story. There was nothing about this movie that wasn't standard action fare. I shudder to think how dumb you think american movie tastes are if this is in the "too intellectual" range. |
You may be right. i haven't read the book in a long long time. i need to go back to the book and read it. The movie seemed very similar to what I remembered from the book. Only main difference is the princess. For some reason, I pictured her with less clothes.
I don't think this movie was dumbed down. for an action film, it did have character development, it had humor, romance, action, I enjoyed willem Dafoe's character, and his daughter. The dog was funny. and the twist at the end was very Sherlock Holmes like.