By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:

1) Um, what? SMW sold about the same as SMB3, both about half of what SMB sold. SM64 sold half of what either SMW and SMB3 sold, so only about 25 % of what SMB did. If you want to count SM64 as a main series Mario game, it's a damn failure, because it performed even worse than the original SMB2.

2) It's not my problem, if you can't read.


@1. Your bringing in SMB2 is utter fail, and you know why, and the reason is Doki Doki panic. Not only is it not a mainline mario game, it isn't a mario game. Geez.

SM64 did 25% of SMB, in line with 50% of SMW, and SMW being 50% of SMB. I'm considering the best metric. First mainline Mario game for the system (this removes the SMB3 doubt of being a sequel on the same platform).

My numbers are fine, your denial isn't.

2) If I couldn't read, I wouldn't be able to write coherently. It's your problem. Why am I wasting my time trying to convince myself of anything. You're totally out of whack. Not always, but here you clearly are.